Richiami di Dispositivi di protezione nell'UE 2024–2026
Un indice costantemente aggiornato di 173 richiami gravi di Dispositivi di protezione in tutta l'UE (2024-01-12 – 2026-11-06), compilato a partire dal EU Safety Gate (RAPEX) e dalle autorità nazionali per la tutela dei consumatori. Ogni voce rimanda all'avviso ufficiale delle autorità.
The earmuffs may unexpectedly produce a loud sound (measured value up to 106 dBA) through the headset speakers. The user is exposed to significant harmful noise levels, causing damage to hearing.…
The retro-reflective material does not have the required reflectance values and the user is not adequately visible in situations where high visibility is essential. This can lead to injuries. The prod…
In the event of an impact, the helmet's retention system could easily become detached and the helmet could completely slip off the head of the user, leaving it exposed to injuries. The product does no…
The UVA-A and AV-B radiation is not sufficiently filtered, posing possible eye damage to the wearer. Moreover, the goggles’ compressive strength is insufficient. The eyecups and strap retainers break,…
In the event of an impact, the helmet's retention system could easily become detached and the helmet could completely slip off the head of the user, leaving it exposed to injuries. The product does no…
In the event of an impact, the helmet's retention system could easily become detached and the helmet could completely slip off the head of the user, leaving it exposed to injuries. The product does no…
The strength and the effectiveness of the helmet are inadequate. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries, due to displacement. The product does not comply with the Personal Protectiv…
In the event of an impact, the helmet could easily become detached and slip off the head of the user, leaving it exposed to injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
2026-10-16 · United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · Serious risk · official alert
The product is marketed and packaged as a “life jacket”, despite being identified within the product documentation and markings as a 50N buoyancy aid. A buoyancy aid does not provide the same level of…
In the event of an impact, the helmet could easily become detached and slip off the head of the user, leaving it exposed to injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
The impact absorption capacity of the helmet is insufficient. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
The impact absorption capacity of the helmet is insufficient. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
The impact absorption capacity of the helmet is insufficient. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
The impact absorption capacity of the helmet is insufficient. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
The respiratory masks have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. Using the product in areas where sanding, painting and polishing take place, and …
The respiratory masks have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. Using the product in areas where sanding, painting and polishing take place, and …
The respiratory masks have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. Using the product in areas where sanding, painting and polishing take place, and …
The retroreflective performance and reflective area of the product are inadequate. As a result, the user is not sufficiently visible in situations where high visibility is essential, which increases t…
The retroreflective performance and design of the product are inadequate. As a result, the user is not sufficiently visible in situations where high visibility is essential, and may suffer injuries. T…
2026-10-09 · United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · Serious risk · official alert
A manufacturing defect in the second-stage spindle assembly may restrict the flow of breathing gas at depths exceeding 45 metres. As a result, the regulator may not supply sufficient breathing gas whe…
The impact absorption capacity of the helmet is insufficient. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Regulation ECE 22-06.…
The respiratory masks have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in areas to sand, paint and polish, and for fine dust an…
The respiratory masks have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in areas to sand, paint and polish, and for fine dust an…
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient (measured as low as 42%). Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements. Thus, even if combined with other reco…
The gloves have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in direct dangers area, there is a risk of coming into contact with…
The gloves have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in direct dangers area, there is a risk of coming into contact with…
The ear muffs have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in direct danger area, there is a risk of suffering irreversible…
2026-09-04 · United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · Serious risk · official alert
The product has not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. The product might not function properly when it is used in the water, causing the user to dr…
There is a defect in the wire gate riveting on these carabiners. This assembly fault could cause the gate to break or detach, posing a risk of carabiner failure in the event of a fall, leading to inju…
The ear muffs have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in direct danger area, there is a risk of suffering irreversible…
The strength and the effectiveness of the helmet are inadequate. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Reg…
The strength and the effectiveness of the helmet are inadequate. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head injuries. The product does not comply with the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Reg…
2026-08-21 · United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · Serious risk · official alert
The affected batches may emit feedback noise (measured value up to 106 dBA) through the headset speakers, leading to damage to hearing.The likelihood of occurrence of this issue can be increased in co…
The gloves have not undergone the required conformity tests for personal protective equipment category III. When the product is used in direct dangers area, there is a risk of coming into contact with…
The plastic material of the product has an excessive concentration of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (measured value: 20% by weight). This phthalate may harm the health by causing possible damage …
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient. Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements. Thus, even if combined with other recommended measures, it may …
The strap in front of the ear may slide backwards, which could affect the stability and optimal hold of the helmet on the head during normal use. In case of an accident this may lead to injuries.…
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient (measured as low as 92 %). Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements. Thus, even if combined with other rec…
Because of the design of the folding mechanism, the ventilation openings are too wide. In the event of an impact, the helmet may not provide sufficient protection to the head and users may suffer head…
The impact absorption capacity of the helmet is insufficient. Moreover, the strength and the effectiveness of the retention system are inadequate. In the event of an impact, users may suffer head inju…
2026-05-15 · United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · Serious risk · official alert
The D-ring handle that is used to unlock the weight pocket from the Buoyancy Compensator Device can detach during use. If this happens, the user will not be able to remove the weight pocket in an emer…
The retro-reflective material does not have the required reflectance values and the user is not adequately visible in situations where high visibility is essential. This can lead to injuries.…
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient (measured as low as 80 %). Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements. Thus, even if combined with other rec…
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient (measured values as low as 79%). Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements. Thus, even if combined with oth…
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient (measured mean values: 32.3%). Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements. Thus, even if combined with other…
The equipment is used together with a free‑fall auto‑belay device, which can cause the equipment to be propelled toward the user’s face, resulting in injury.…
2026-04-17 · United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · Serious risk · official alert
Incorrect webbing routing through the front/sternal D-ring and/or leg buckles can cause key safety components of the harness to break or disconnect, leading to injuries.…
Cracking or fracturing in the area of the exhalation valve may compromise the structural integrity and sealing performance of the respirator, thereby reducing its effectiveness. As a result, the weare…
The total filtration capacity of the mask is insufficient (measured values: 33.4%). Consequently, the product does not fulfil the health and safety requirements, thus it may not properly protect the u…
The crampons can come off or break, causing injuries to the user.…
Metodologia e fonti. Aggregati dai registri ufficiali dei richiami europei e nazionali (principalmente il Safety Gate dell'UE / RAPEX) e riflettono la classificazione adottata da ciascuna autorità. ProductGuru è un servizio d'informazione indipendente, non un ente governativo, e non fornisce alcun parere medico, legale o finanziario — consultare sempre la fonte ufficiale. Richiami di beni di consumo a rischio grave dal 2024 in poi. Liberamente citabili con attribuzione.